The influence of a personal sample of the cultural and historical era on the formation of the value orientations of the personality in modern conditions

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/iscs.2025.27.229

Ключові слова:

personal sample of the cultural-historical era, culture, value system, standardless measurement

Анотація

Our world is not something fixed, unchanging. There are not only physical changes, climate changes, but also social ones. Most often, social changes are reflected in cultural monuments. Social revolutions create new images of heroes, which journalists, writers, artists, screenwriters, film directors "pick up", complement, and somewhat embellish.

The importance of this or that cultural and social phenomenon or this or that cultural event is determined according to the personal, human measurement of these phenomena and events. We determine the significance of the changes taking place in society or the state as a whole for ourselves in accordance with those changes that have happened to us personally. Being a deeply social being, a person cannot help but feel the changes taking place in society. She accepts (or does not accept - she lives in conflict) values, morals, rules of behavior that are specific to this era and culture, within which she was formed as a person. That is why many famous philosophers, starting from the time of Antiquity, consider man to be the standard of cultural values and heritage of mankind.

Since a person himself determines (evaluates) what is important (value) for him, what is good for him today, then the person himself can be considered not only the one who conducts the assessment, but also a kind of model (standard) of his era. It reflects all the greatness and power of its era. A personal sample of a cultural-historical era can be imagined as a new abstract construction consisting of typical essential characteristics of a certain cultural-historical era.

If a person can be a kind of standard of cultural values of the era and is a kind of example of his era, then it is advisable to consider the possibility of using measurement to find out the characteristics, mechanisms of replacing one example with another, because there is an opinion that only what can be measured can be improved. When analyzing the processes of applying a personal sample, its formation, we turned to the methodology of standard-free measurement.

Посилання

Zagyrnyak M. Yu. 2012. The concept of value in H. Rickert and ego interpretation in the philosophy of S. I. Hessen. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2012-1-4

Yefimov D.V. 2021. Vykorystannia dopovnenoi realnosti (AR) v osviti. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Vol. 2(1). Р. 219-225. https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-4360-2021-1-2-34

Bosa V., Mariiev D., Balalaieva O., Krokhmal A. ta Solovei A. 2024. Vprovadzhennia virtualnoi realnosti u vykladannia inozemnoi movy. Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 13 (73). Р.187-199. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.73.01.15

Malaichuk V., Mozghovoi O., Petrenko O. 2001. Informatsiino-vymiriuvalni tekhnolohii neruinivnoho kontroliu: Navch. posib. 240 р.

Punchenko N. O. 2013. Metody ta zasoby pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti otsiniuvannia kharakterystyk impulsno-kodovykh moduliatoriv shyrokosmuhovykh syhnaliv: avtoref. dys. kand. tekhn. nauk: 05.12.13; Khmelnyts. nats. un-t. Khmelnytskyi. 20 р.

Punchenko O. P. 2008. Bezetalonne vymiriuvannia dukhovnosti. Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vol. 2(18). Р. 361-365.

Punchenko O. P. 2014. Informatsiini resursy suspilstva: sutnist, struktura, formy reprezentatsii ta rol u susplnomu rozvytku. Naukove piznannia: metodolohiia ta tekhnolohiia : Filosofiia. Vоl. 2. P. 129-136.

Punchenko O. P. 2014. Metodolohichni novatsii u suchasnomu naukovomu piznanni. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii. Vol. 57. P. 27-37.

Punchenko, O. P., Tsyra, O. V. 2020. The Influence of Covid-19 on the Spiritual World of Students Formation in the Conditions of Globalization Crisis. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filosofski nauky Vol. (88). P. 123-134.

Ossowska Maria. 2000. Normy moralne: próba systematyzacji [Moral norms: An attempt at systematization]. 4th edition. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. ISBN 83-01-13278-7

Ossowska Maria. O człowieku, moralności i nauce: miscellanea [On Man, morality, and science: miscellanies, ed. by Maria Ofierska and Maria Smoła. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. ISBN 83-01-00801-6

Ossowska Maria. 1977. O pewnych przemianach etyki walki [On certain changes in the ethics of struggle]. 2nd edition. Warszawa: Niezależna Oficyna Wydawnicza (a Samisdat edition)

Ossowska Maria. 2005. Socjologia moralności: zarys zagadnień [The sociology of morality: An outline of its problems]. 4th edition. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe

Kyslynska D. M. 2016. Osoblyvosti struktury indyvidualnykh zhyttievykh tsinnostei maibutnikh pravookhorontsiv u riznykh sferakh zhyttia. Nauka i osvita. Vol. 7. P. 15-20.

Kyslynska D. M., Miloradova N. E. 2016. Tsinnosti ta tsinnisni oriientatsii v psykholohichnykh teoriiakh. Visnyk KhNPU imeni H. S. Skovorody. Psykholohiia. Vypusk 53. P. 64-73.

Kyslynska D.M. 2015. Tsinnisni oriientatsii: teoretychnyi ohliad. Problemy ekstremalnoi ta kryzovoi psykholohii. Vol. 18. P. 89-97.

Himanen P. 2001. The Hacker Ethic and Spirit of the Information Age. Prologue by Torvalds L.; Epilogue by Castels M. Pub. Vintage. 234 p.

Loginova V. S. 2009. Personal sample: the content of the concept and its place in the pedagogical terminological apparatus. Academic notes. Psychology series. Pedagogy. Vol. 3-4 (7-8). P. 64-72.

Chip R. S. 2022. Psykholohichni osoblyvosti rozvytku osobystisnoi identychnosti pidlitkiv. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ser. Psykholohiia. Uzhhorod. Vol. 1. P. 126-130. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2022.1.24

Chip R. S. 2023. Stanovlennia osobystosti maibutnoho fakhivtsia u protsesi dialohizatsii osvitnoho prostoru. Aksiopsykholohichni vektory rozvytku suchasnoi osvity : zbirnyk materialiv Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Ternopil, 19 – 20 zhovtnia 2023 r.). Ternopil : TNPU im. V. Hnatiuka. P. 95-100.

Chip R. S. 2012. Tsinnisni oriientatsii yak mekhanizmy rehuliatsii povedinky osobystosti. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii. Vol. 18. P. 810-818.

Chip R. S. 2019. Vplyv pidlitkovoi subkultury na stanovlennia gendernoi identychnosti u period doroslishannia osobystosti. Aktualni problemy reformuvannia systemy vykhovannia ta osvity v Ukraini : zb. tez nauk. robit uchasn. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., m. Lviv, 26-27 kvitnia 2019 r. Lviv. P. 34-37.

Ruchka A. 2010. Tsinnisna mentalnist vikovykh hrup sotsiumu. Sotsiolohichni doslidzhennia kultury : kontseptsii ta praktyky: zb.nauk.prats / nauk.red. Shcherbyna V. M., vidpov.red. Naumova M.Iu. Kyiv : In-t kulturolohii NAMU. P.117-127.

Ruchka A. 2010. Tsinnisna mentalnist vikovykh hrup sotsiumu. Sotsiolohichni doslidzhennia kultury : kontseptsii ta praktyky: zb. Nauk. prats. Kyiv : In-t kulturolohii NAMU. P. 117-127.

Ruchka A. Tsinnosti ta tsinnisna zmina u suchasnomu suspilstvi. Prykladna kulturolohiia i kulturni praktyky, P. 172-179.

Sliusarevskyi M. M. 2013. Metodolohichni pryntsypy rozroblennia i kryterii otsiniuvannia sotsialno-psykholohichnykh teorii. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii. Vol. 32. P. 3-19.

Sliusarevskyi M.M. 1999. Teoretychni problemy dohovirnoho upravlinnia chuzhym mainom v Ukraini : avtoref. dys... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03 / Natsionalna yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv. 20 p.

Gotynyan-Zhuravlova V. V. 2020. Social and philosophical components of standard-free measurement: types, definitions, applications: monograph. Odesa : Publishing House "Helvetika". 358 p.

Krasynskaya I. S. 2008. On the system of values (post) of a modern human being. Scholarly notes of the Tavricheskogo national universiteta named after V. I. Vernadskyi. Series "Philosophy. Sociology". Vol. 21 (60). No. 1. P. 445-450.

Bekha V. P. 2010. Autopoiesis of social systems: a monograph / scientific editor. Kyiv : Publishing House of M. P. Dragomanov State University. 748 p.

Boyko V. A. 2009. Personal dimension of culture and the specifics of tradition reproduction in the modern world. Herald of NSU. Series: Philosophy. Vol. 7, Issue 1. P. 71-76.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2026-04-02 — Оновлено 2026-04-06

Номер

Розділ

Філософсько-культурологічні студії